FIA publishes clarification of Ferrari deal in response to displeasure from seven teams

  • Published on 05 Mar 2020 13:17
  • comments 17
  • By: Fergal Walsh

The FIA has issued a clarification statement relating to the announcement it made last week regarding the investigation into Ferrari's power unit.

All non-Ferrari powered teams released a joint statement on Wednesday, demanding clarification over the conclusion of the investigation, as the FIA highlighted that a settlement had been reached and would remain between the two parties.

The FIA examined the Ferrari power unit amid suspicions that it did not fall in line with the regulations, admitting that it too doubted the legality of the unit. 

However, F1's governing body says that no further investigation is necessary “due to the complexity of the matter and the material impossibility to provide the unequivocal evidence of a breach”.

Full FIA statement

“The FIA has conducted detailed technical analysis on the Scuderia Ferrari Power Unit as it is entitled to do for any competitor in the FIA Formula One World Championship.

“The extensive and thorough investigations undertaken during the 2019 season raised suspicions that the Scuderia Ferrari PU could be considered as not operating within the limits of the FIA regulations at all times.

“The Scuderia Ferrari firmly opposed the suspicions and reiterated that its PU always operated in compliance with the regulations. The FIA was not fully satisfied but decided that further action would not necessarily result in a conclusive case due to the complexity of the matter and the material impossibility to provide the unequivocal evidence of a breach.

“To avoid the negative consequences that a long litigation would entail especially in light of the uncertainty of the outcome of such litigations and in the best interest of the Championship and of its stakeholders, the FIA, in compliance with Article 4 (ii) of its Judicial and Disciplinary Rules (JDR), decided to enter into an effective and dissuasive settlement agreement with Ferrari to terminate the proceedings.

“This type of agreement is a legal tool recognised as an essential component of any disciplinary system and is used by many public authorities and other sport federations in the handling of disputes.

“The confidentiality of the terms of the settlement agreement is provided for by Article 4 (vi) of the JDR.

“The FIA will take all necessary action to protect the sport and its role and reputation as regulator of the FIA Formula One World Championship.”

TheDentist

Posts: 24

Ferrari have been cheating for years, back from the days when Michal Schumacher was caught using illegal engine modes and was allowed to keep his race wins!! FIA always turn the other eye when it comes to Ferrari. Now imagine if this was Mercedes in Ferrari’s position, what would everyone be sa... [Read more]

  • 3
  • Mar 5 2020 - 21:48

Replies (17)

Login to reply
  • Snooky

    Posts: 121

    Quite worrying that the people governing the sport are being outsmarted by those they are governing

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2020 - 14:26
    • Dert38

      Posts: 376

      it may be not like that

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2020 - 10:05
    • Snooky

      Posts: 121

      They’ve said they don’t believe the PU was always operating within the regulations, but if they had proof it wouldn’t go through a long litigation process. The FIA has a similar issue with the Ferrari battery’s a couple of years ago where they couldn’t work out how the system worked. I love that teams can be clever and think up new systems and ways of going faster, but when you have a regulator than cannot understand how you’ve done something when presented with the items and ECUs then it’s a bit of a cause for concern

      • + 0
      • Mar 8 2020 - 10:41
  • RogerF1

    Posts: 501

    DAS is just another prime example. If it hadn’t have been for on-board cameras behind the drivers nobody would ever have known and Merc wouldn’t have told anybody either. Maybe Ferrari dreamed up a wheeze but weren’t sure of its legality and subsequently the FIA decided whatever they were doing was likely to be outside the rules but couldn’t prove what was going on?

    • + 1
    • Mar 5 2020 - 15:14
    • Snooky

      Posts: 121

      Not quite, FIA have known about DAS for months, but a loophole in whether it was classified as a change of suspension or changing the steering meant Merc avoided a ban this year (which is why the closed the loophole for next year). The FIA can’t seem to be able to understand and prove quite how Ferrari were getting around the regs, they seem sure they were but like the battery system they had before, the FIA can’t work out how it works so can’t penalise them for it

      • + 1
      • Mar 5 2020 - 22:01
  • Kean

    Posts: 692

    So Ferrari cheated, but stopped doing so and the FIA can't prove it so they're dropping the case?

    • + 2
    • Mar 5 2020 - 15:18
    • Dert38

      Posts: 376

      I suppose honda was cheating too (austria and some races) then they end up quietly.

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2020 - 10:04
    • Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. Ferrari Did cheat in one instance, when they overloaded Leclerc's Ferrari with fuel. That one's confirmed to be outside of regulations. The other aspects they just cannot prove, meaning either Ferrari simply have a good PU, or they did some trick what isn't monitored by the FIA, what was hard to prove by telemetry in general and couldn't be physically traced. The latter point implies it is a legal trick or a really clever cheat.
      As for Honda (come on, you are just trolling): in Austria "and some other races"(citation required): their fuel loads were a ok, their fuel flow was Ok, their ERS was operating as per the regulations. They just used a higher engine mode, for all we know, unless they found a really good exploit, which would then A) either be a loophole in the regulations, or B) be something the FIA were too silly or too unaware of to notice. At any rate, you really think the other teams would be silent if they suspected Honda of pulling their legs?

      • + 1
      • Mar 6 2020 - 13:19
  • JuJuHound

    Posts: 352

    So Max was saying this but everybody were unhappy of his behavior and now we see he was right

    • + 1
    • Mar 5 2020 - 16:00
    • The difference is in how you say it. Max made baseless accusations at a time where nothing was guaranteed, and the FIA only suspected that Ferrari pulled their leg. Now, basically, the FIA has confirmed that they cannot confirm that Ferrari pulled their leg. So the accusations remain baseless. All we know is that at at least one GP, Leclerc had an overfueled car.

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2020 - 13:21
    • boudy

      Posts: 1,168

      Max was correct but a bit clumsy in his word choice. Ferrari did work outside the nature of the rules and did something that I see as cheating. We know that after they got found out because someone told on them. Either the FIA found nothing and Ferrari aren't guilty or they did find something and they are. It can't be both which is what the FIA is claiming. Without proof or admission they can't be guilty and the reverse is with proof they are guilty.

      This is not some kind of invention that make the car go faster, instead its a way to overcome the detection of the fuel flow restriction.

      Ask yourself: If Honda or Renault did this would they get the same kind of treatment? If the answer if Yes than no issue, more likely No than Ferrari has used its privileged position. This all about getting equal treatment for all the teams not for Ferrari to misuse it's position.

      • + 0
      • Mar 8 2020 - 09:05
    • Well, I cannot quite blame him for speaking out, but yes, clumsy wording, and we still don't know if they actually did cheat. And in the meantime, he has locked himself out of ever working with the prancing horse, regardless of them cheating or not.

      In theory, we kinda know the answer to your latter concern. Remember how Renault was treated this very season, when they were found out to have implemented a feature what may or may not have been utilized to boost PU performance but wasn't inside the regulations? They were slammed down almost instantly. I am very sure it'd be the same if Honda did it (and so far no team have suspected Honda of out-of regulation behaviour). And the FIA have tried to clamp down on Ferrari now about three times: first in-season with the clarifications RB demanded, second when they fined Ferrari for that extra fuel Leclerc was carrying, and now a third time with the extra post-season investigation. We've had them show leniency with Merc' and Ferrari with the oil burning. But now? I genuinly think they've tried to clamp down on any potential cheating from Ferrari's part. They were just clueless in how to handle the correspondence with teams and press.

      • + 0
      • Mar 8 2020 - 18:29
  • Had they just said this from the start this would never have gotten so messy. I had no idea Swedish politicians governed the FIA!

    • + 1
    • Mar 5 2020 - 16:49
  • TheDentist

    Posts: 24

    Ferrari have been cheating for years, back from the days when Michal Schumacher was caught using illegal engine modes and was allowed to keep his race wins!! FIA always turn the other eye when it comes to Ferrari. Now imagine if this was Mercedes in Ferrari’s position, what would everyone be saying then..

    • + 3
    • Mar 5 2020 - 21:48
    • Dert38

      Posts: 376

      would everyone be saying then: Ban the system for 2021?????

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2020 - 10:02
  • Dert38

    Posts: 376

    Engine > DAS

    • + 0
    • Mar 6 2020 - 10:01
  • f1ski

    Posts: 726

    FIA couldn't prove cheating. Ferrari denied it agreement made. There are probably other details not mentioned and don't be surprised if Honda or Mercedes get investigated early season.

    • + 0
    • Mar 7 2020 - 15:31

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

BEGrand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

World Championship standings 2023

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Related news

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrain
29 - Mar 2 2024
Bahrain
7 - Mar 9 2024
Saudi Arabia
22 - Mar 24 2024
Australia
5 - Apr 7 2024
Japan
19 - Apr 21 2024
China
3 - May 5 2024
United States of America
17 - May 19 2024
Italy
24 - May 26 2024
Monaco
7 - Jun 9 2024
Canada
21 - Jun 23 2024
Spain
28 - Jun 30 2024
Austria
5 - Jul 7 2024
United Kingdom
19 - Jul 21 2024
Hungary
26 - Jul 28 2024
Belgium
23 - Aug 25 2024
Netherlands
30 - Sep 1 2024
Italy
13 - Sep 15 2024
Azerbaijan
20 - Sep 22 2024
Singapore
18 - Oct 20 2024
United States of America
25 - Oct 27 2024
Mexico
1 - Nov 3 2024
Brazil
22 - Nov 24 2024
United States of America
29 - Dec 1 2024
Qatar
6 - Dec 8 2024
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
29 - Mar 2 2024
7 - Mar 9 2024
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
22 - Mar 24 2024
Australia Albert Park
5 - Apr 7 2024
19 - Apr 21 2024
3 - May 5 2024
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
17 - May 19 2024
24 - May 26 2024
Monaco Monte Carlo
7 - Jun 9 2024
21 - Jun 23 2024
28 - Jun 30 2024
Austria Red Bull Ring
5 - Jul 7 2024
United Kingdom Silverstone
19 - Jul 21 2024
Hungary Hungaroring
26 - Jul 28 2024
23 - Aug 25 2024
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
30 - Sep 1 2024
Italy Monza
13 - Sep 15 2024
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
20 - Sep 22 2024
18 - Oct 20 2024
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
25 - Oct 27 2024
1 - Nov 3 2024
Brazil Interlagos
22 - Nov 24 2024
United States of America Las Vegas Street Circuit
29 - Dec 1 2024
6 - Dec 8 2024
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule

Team profile

Show full profile
show sidebar

Total queries: 1
Total time: 0.054638862609863
timesincestartcallerannotatebtdesc
0.000448
instantiate query log (0Q - total module time: 0.00061202s)
""
0.001065
boot (0Q - total module time: 0.00010586s)
""
0.001175
translation-init (1Q - total module time: 0.00096393s)
""
0.000283960.001843/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/index.php/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/vendor/doctrine/dbal/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Statement.php:189(stopQuery)
/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/app/Repository/Redirect.php:105(execute)
/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/app/Entities/Redirect.php:112(findByOrigin)
/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/app/Services/Redirects.php:108(getRedirectOrFalse)
/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/app/Router.php:115(checkForDBRedirects)
/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/app/website.php:260(execute)
/var/www/dev-priyantha.gptoday.net/public_html/index.php:11(require_once)
SELECT redirects.id, redirects.origin, redirects.referer FROM redirects WHERE redirects.origin = :origin ORDER BY id
{"origin":"\/en\/news\/f1\/254497\/fia-publishes-clarification-of-ferrari-deal-in-response-to-displeasure-from-seven-teams"}
0.002142
controller::news/f1/254497/fia-publishes-clarification-of-ferrari-deal-in-response-to-displeasure-from-seven-teams (0Q - total module time: 0.04793096s)
""
0.050077 cacheAble: yes
module:News\Result (0Q - total module time: 0.00041008s)
""
0.050489 cacheAble: yes
module:News\Photos (0Q - total module time: 0.00011706s)
""
0.050609 cacheAble: yes
module:News\Trending (0Q - total module time: 0.00010896s)
""
0.050720 cacheAble: yes
module:News\Reply (0Q - total module time: 0.00010681s)
""
0.050829 cacheAble: no
module:Sidebar (0Q - total module time: 0.00033712s)
""
0.051169
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::ads (0Q - total module time: 0.00001192s)
""
0.051183
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::gpschedule (0Q - total module time: 0.00000191s)
""
0.051185 cacheAble: yes
module:GpSchedule (0Q - total module time: 0.00022817s)
""
0.051416
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::results (0Q - total module time: 0.00000405s)
""
0.051422 cacheAble: yes
module:Results (0Q - total module time: 0.00011802s)
""
0.051542
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::testcalendar (0Q - total module time: 0.00000405s)
""
0.051546 cacheAble: yes
module:TestCalendar (0Q - total module time: 0.00010300s)
""
0.051652
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::ads (0Q - total module time: 0.00000501s)
""
0.051657
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::ads (0Q - total module time: 0.00000191s)
""
0.051659
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::relatednews (0Q - total module time: 0.00000215s)
""
0.051663 cacheAble: yes
module:RelatedNews (0Q - total module time: 0.00007606s)
""
0.051741
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::whoischatting (0Q - total module time: 0.00000501s)
""
0.051747
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::ads (0Q - total module time: 0.00000215s)
""
0.051749
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::poll (0Q - total module time: 0.00000095s)
""
0.051751 cacheAble: no
module:Poll (0Q - total module time: 0.00176311s)
""
0.053516
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::ads (0Q - total module time: 0.00000501s)
""
0.053523
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::ads (0Q - total module time: 0.00000215s)
""
0.053525
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::gpcalendar (0Q - total module time: 0.00000191s)
""
0.053527 cacheAble: yes
module:GpCalendar (0Q - total module time: 0.00015593s)
""
0.053685
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::driver_Info (0Q - total module time: 0.00000405s)
""
0.053691 cacheAble: no
module:Driver\Info (0Q - total module time: 0.00002003s)
""
0.053712
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::team_Info (0Q - total module time: 0.00000310s)
""
0.053715 cacheAble: yes
module:Team\Info (0Q - total module time: 0.00010705s)
""
0.053825
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::linkedKeywords (0Q - total module time: 0.00000501s)
""
0.053831
sidebar:sidebar-news-read::gpsidebarnavigation (0Q - total module time: 0.00000215s)
""
0.053833 cacheAble: no
module:GpSidebarNavigation (0Q - total module time: 0.00032282s)
""
0.054158 cacheAble: yes
module:Layout\Footer (0Q - total module time: 0.00009704s)
""
0.054258 cacheAble: yes
module:News\Breaking (0Q - total module time: 0.00037599s)
""
0.054637
done
""